Bar Council of Delhi · D/2658/2015 हिन्दी
Home›Legal Insights›Appeals

Appeals

Appealing an NCLT Order to the NCLAT — Limitation

The 30-day limit and 15-day outer limit, when time starts running, grounds that succeed, seeking a stay, the paper book and the appeal to the Supreme Court.

By Dr. Saurabh Kapoor, Advocate · Updated 2026-09-22 · 4 min read

The clock

An appeal against an NCLT order under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code lies to the NCLAT under Section 61 within 30 days of the order; the NCLAT may extend the period by not more than 15 days on sufficient cause, and cannot condone delay beyond 45 days at all. Under the Companies Act, 2013, an appeal under Section 421 lies within 45 days, extendable by a further 45 days.

The Supreme Court has held that limitation runs from the date of pronouncement of the order, not from the date the party obtains a copy — and that the time taken to obtain a certified copy is excluded only if the application for it was made within the limitation period (V. Nagarajan v. SKS Ispat & Power Ltd. (2021); Sanket Kumar Agarwal v. APG Logistics (2023) on the exclusion of the time from applying for the copy until it is ready). The practical rule: apply for the certified copy on the day of the order or the next day, and file the appeal with the downloaded copy if the certified copy is delayed.

Which orders are appealable

Every order of the NCLT under the IBC is appealable under Section 61, including orders admitting or rejecting a Section 7, 9 or 95 application, orders approving a resolution plan (on the limited grounds in Section 61(3)), liquidation orders (Section 61(4)), and orders on avoidance applications and claims. Interlocutory orders are appealable in principle, but the NCLAT is reluctant to interfere with procedural directions.

Grounds

An appeal is not a re-hearing of the facts at large. Grounds that succeed are usually of these kinds:

  • Jurisdictional error — the application was not maintainable (limitation, threshold, the applicant not a financial or operational creditor, a pre-existing dispute in a Section 9 case);
  • Non-consideration of a material document or objection that was on record;
  • Misapplication of the law — for example, admitting on an acknowledgment that does not satisfy Section 18 of the Limitation Act;
  • Breach of natural justice — an order passed without hearing a necessary party;
  • For resolution-plan approvals, the specific grounds in Section 61(3): contravention of law, material irregularity by the RP, non-payment of the dues of the insolvency process, non-compliance with the Board’s criteria, or any other statutory ground.

Interim relief

Filing an appeal does not stay the order. The NCLAT may grant a stay on an application, on terms — a deposit of part of the amount, an undertaking, or the continuation of the IRP with restrictions. Where the order under appeal is an admission order, the appellant frequently seeks a stay of the constitution of the committee of creditors or of the publication of the Form G inviting resolution plans, to preserve the possibility of settlement; the NCLAT considers the conduct of the corporate debtor, any settlement offer and the interests of other creditors.

The paper book

The NCLAT Rules, 2016 prescribe the form: the memorandum of appeal with grounds and the relief sought, a synopsis and list of dates, the impugned order (certified copy or as downloaded, with an application for exemption), the pleadings and documents before the NCLT, the application for stay, the application for condonation of delay where the appeal is beyond 30 days, an affidavit of service on the respondents, and the fee. Defects noted by the registry must be cured within the time given, and a defective appeal is not treated as filed until refiled.

The hearing and the outcome

The NCLAT hears the appeal on the record below. It may affirm, set aside or modify the order, or remand the matter to the NCLT with directions. In insolvency matters the NCLAT is expected to decide expeditiously, and in practice admission appeals are heard within weeks where a stay is in force.

Supreme Court

A further appeal lies to the Supreme Court under Section 62 IBC within 45 days (extendable by 15) on a question of law arising out of the NCLAT’s order. The Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasised the limited scope of this appeal and the finality the Code intends.

Practical checklist after an adverse order

  1. Note the date of pronouncement and the last date for appeal — 30 days for IBC.
  2. Apply for the certified copy immediately.
  3. Obtain the complete record from the NCLT file — every pleading, document and order.
  4. Decide on the interim relief needed and the terms you can offer.
  5. Consider settlement in parallel; an appeal often improves the negotiating position.
  6. Serve the respondents and file the affidavit of service with the appeal.

Frequently asked questions

Can the NCLAT condone a delay of more than 15 days?

No, in IBC appeals. Section 61(2) fixes an outer limit of 45 days from the order, and the NCLAT has no power to condone beyond that.

Is a pre-deposit required for an NCLAT appeal?

Not under the IBC or the Companies Act as a condition of filing, unlike DRAT appeals under the SARFAESI Act; a deposit may be required as a condition of stay.

Does an appeal stop the resolution process?

Not automatically. Unless a stay is granted, the IRP continues, the CoC is constituted and the process moves on; the appeal is decided on the position as it stands, which is why the stay application is filed with the appeal.

Can a new argument be raised for the first time in appeal?

Pure questions of law arising on the record can be raised; new facts or documents require an application and a justification for not having produced them before the NCLT.

Talk about your matter

This article is general information. Your position depends on your documents and dates — call or WhatsApp to arrange a consultation.

☎ +91 99103 44303WhatsAppEnquiry form

Published for legal awareness and general information only; it is not legal advice and does not create an advocate–client relationship. Law and procedure change — verify the current position before acting.